Coaching your engineers in TDD and continuous delivery until they run it.
AI makes every developer faster at producing code. It does not make the code better. We pair with your engineers on your codebase, set up the delivery platform on your repositories, and leave when the health score and DORA metrics are yours to hold.
What it covers
Pairing on real work
Not workshops. Our engineers sit with yours on the tickets already in the sprint, and the practices are learned by shipping.
The delivery platform on your repos
Quality gates, specification driven development and the code health score, set up on your repositories and left with your team.
Practices that hold
Test driven development, clean architecture, small batches, trunk based development and continuous delivery, held as daily discipline.
A measured handover
The same health score and DORA metrics you saw during the engagement, reported by your team after we step back.
How we do it
Diagnosis of where the team is
The repository diagnosis plus a week alongside the team. Where delivery stalls, and which practice would move it most.
Platform coaching, one to two engineers
We set up the platform and train your team. You run it, with us on call for the first releases.
Enablement, two to three engineers
We coach the practices alongside your team until they are self sufficient, pairing on the work already in flight.
Step back on evidence
When the metrics hold for a quarter without us, we step back. That is the outcome, and it is written into the engagement.
- 1
Diagnosis of where the team is
The repository diagnosis plus a week alongside the team. Where delivery stalls, and which practice would move it most.
- 2
Platform coaching, one to two engineers
We set up the platform and train your team. You run it, with us on call for the first releases.
- 3
Enablement, two to three engineers
We coach the practices alongside your team until they are self sufficient, pairing on the work already in flight.
- 4
Step back on evidence
When the metrics hold for a quarter without us, we step back. That is the outcome, and it is written into the engagement.
What you get
- The delivery platform set up on your repositories
- Your engineers shipping with TDD, small batches and continuous delivery
- A code health score and DORA metrics your team reports, not us
- Written practices and runbooks in your own terms
- A step back date, agreed on evidence
Where we have done it
view.com.au: the Avesta team on the account grew from 7 to 48 through the Aspire programme, with Aspire grown engineers embedded in delivery. Product sense inside daily engineering is what holds quality steady.
view.com.auAvesta Aspire: our own talent programme, where engineers learn by working on live projects beside senior mentors. Clients ask for Aspire engineers by name.
Avesta Aspire
Questions we get asked
Our developers already use AI tools. Why do we need this?
Because AI amplifies whatever is already there. With discipline it makes a team faster; without it the codebase degrades faster than review can keep up. Enablement is the discipline part.
How long until you step back?
Is this training?
Also under product development
Talk it through
Tell us what you need from team enablement.
Thirty minutes with one of our architects. We will tell you whether it is a pilot, a build, or not worth doing yet.